Skip to main content

Lessons in internet responsibility

I guess I learned some lessons in internet etiquette this week.

Earlier this week, as I was driving to work, I was listening to Scott and Sue talk about Facebook, which I do, and Twitter, which I don't. These two are a lot like those who are regular readers of this blog, who are in turn a lot like me. We don't like to cause any undue hard feelings. Sue had mentioned that she has "defriended" some from Facebook because they have posted something offensive or other derogatory to her, or have posted unfair to some of her coworkers.

I called them and told them that I would stick to my simple blog, as Facebook and Twitter are too fast moving. Besides none of you want to know when I'm drinking a Coke Zero. But yesterday changed my perception of my "simple blog."

After posting the news about the unfortunate passing of Linda Trivisonno, I noticed that I was getting hits like crazy. I ended up getting 508 hits yesterday, way more than my previous high. I also posted a message of condolence to Mike Trivisonno on the message board I frequent. One of the trolls there decided to take me to task about what I've been posting all week. I then posted that I've been kicking myself because of that. Former Cleveland radio personality, Danny Wright, come on the board and told me not to be hard on myself. I thanked Danny for that and explained that I had taken two posts off my blog, as most of the people checking out my blog were not looking for what would seem to them as a petty, and unfair, dispute.

This was one of these moments that enlightened me as to why bloggers are looked at in a very dim light. I realize that even though I can put whatever I want on this blogspot, I should be responsible for what I post, for the 45-60 hits I on a usual day, or for the times I get a huge spike.

That goes for all social networking. You really have no idea who you are going to effect with your messages.

Comments

Busy Bee Suz said…
I think you may be stressing yourself out about this Cliff. So don't. :)
I am not a big fan of facebook and would not think to twitter.
I do enjoy the blogging, if I find something offensive, then I just don't read it. If someone leaves an un-nice comment, that delete button is really handy. :)
Take care, Suz
struke said…
Cliff...I feel the same about Twitter. IM and e-mail have already caused people's grammar and writing skills to erode. Limiting responses to 140 characters or whatever it is, encourages more poor communication.

You are a good man in that you actually have feelings and care about others.

No one wishes cancer on anybody, not even Trivisonno's wife. I pray for him and his family. Dealing with cancer is tough enough. Removing the posts criticizing Triv was the right move. Someone from the family might have logged on to your blog and gotten sucker punched.

The move to remove the posts was the right and comassionate thing to do.
J. Moses said…
Cliff,

I've taken a lot of heat in the last week. Not for anything I said about a specific radio/TV personality - but for things I've said about television in general in town. It's all in how you handle it. I believe that for maybe the next few weeks, criticism of Triv should take a backseat to support and condolences.

For your part, I believe you handled it well. Again I commend you for removing those posts - it was the time to do so.
Minerva said…
If someone thinks that being insensitive to others is in your nature, they need to read more than a few entries in your blog. You are just the opposite.
I agree that we need to be responsible for what we post. you never know when someone will google something and end up on your blog. I've had a few comments when people took something I wrote the wrong way and that was a bit upsetting because it was out there.

Popular posts from this blog

Post 800: Time to chat

Hi Guys, It's hard to believe that this is post number 800 for this blog. I started this blog out of my desire to communicate. Since radio and television is becoming more and more automated and less and less personal, I'm glad I made the decision to go in this direction as it has given me many blessings. When I first decided to write my musings, a friend from the radio and television boards who goes by the name of newsnomore, told me not to be discouraged if I didn't get any readers. The fact that I did in the early going made me surprised and grateful that anyone was enjoying what I wrote. I've had people tell me that maybe it wasn't meant for me to ever be in radio, that maybe my calling was blogging. Nowadays I think blogging makes for better two way conversation than terrestrial radio, especially the way I do it, non confrontational. The closest I come from any confrontation is the innocent digs that Pat and I shoot at each other. On an average day I get betwee...

My job

I have worked at my company for, unofficially, 17 years. When I first started working there in June, 1992, the average work week was 55-57 hours. Sometimes you worked more than that. I was 36 years old at the time and I could handle the long hours and short nights of sleep. 17 years and three knee surgeries later, I need less hours work and more hours sleep. Even moving into a quasi desk job, I still find it difficult to crawl out of bed at 3am. I could get up later if I wanted to put up with both rush hours. But this morning, things will change slightly. I received a call from my department manager yesterday. I was notified that I had to cut my time down to 40 hours. This would be down from 44-45 that I normally work. No surprise there as all the other departments got notified before I was. And I had to split my time between plants, doing calibrations at the other shop 1-1/2 days a week. I'm actually looking forward to the change. I also like the prospect of getting an hour extra...

From a "Battleground State"

I am going to make this one short and sweet. I live in Ohio, in this election season, one of the so called "Battleground states," a state crucial for any candidate presidential hopes. Of course we have had many visits from presidential and vice presidential candidates. Other blogs have dissected both campaigns so I will not. The only questions I have is will the promises made by either of these candidates exclusive to these states be fulfilled, or will they prove only to be hot air?