Skip to main content

Profanity and our times

I can remember when I was a senior in high school. I was participating in intramural volleyball. The teams were co-ed. I also had a very bad temper as a teenager, and when I felt it was necessary, I cursed like a "sailor on leave". I wasn't very good at volleyball either. My team was playing a game and I missed the ball and somebody hit my hot button. I then yelled every foul word I knew(or so it seems) at the guy, and one of the teachers took me out of the game.

The next day I went to talk to this teacher and he reminded me of the incident and told me that I was lucky I wasn't suspended from school for that display of language, especially since there were young ladies present. I asked him if I should have thrown a punch and he told me that that might have been less severe.

During the next several years my language didn't get any better. Maybe it was just as well I didn't make it into radio at the time. I would have had a short career. People would tell me about it and my standard answer would be that I didn't use the Lord's name in vain. My language would change for the better after I got married, saved, and involved in church.

Between 1980 and today I noticed that things gradually changed for the worse. Language I wouldn't use around ladies was used more by women than men. And I was in professional situations where people used the Lord's name in vain almost as often as they breathed.

I also noticed in the media things gradually changed. I would listen to John Lanigan when he had his program on 1220/WGAR, and I thought he was getting away with something when he used all sorts of innuendo. Some were appalled because he used innuendo as entertainment. Gary Dee shocked his audience, come close, and sometimes crossed the line, which caused him to be fired many times.

I know times have changed and we have lost most of our respect for each other. I can tell by the language we use without regard of who might be present.

It pains me that language we would only speak in hushed tones and not in mixed company can be said on over the air radio and television. As long as we are politically correct we can be as foul as we want. To tell someone to police their language is an infringement of their first amendment rights.

I think that a lot of radio personalities need to go back to journalism class to learn what entertainment really is. Maybe listen to some old Bill Cosby recordings, or maybe Bob Newhart, and steal some of their material.

And I think the general population needs to look at the dictionary to find some new words since a majority of people are suffering from, as my grandmother used to say, a limited vocabulary.

Comments

Anonymous said…
This is timely...in my office we have been considering putting out a collection box to which everyone would donate a $1.00 if they cursed. The problem was that we couldn't agree on was was a curse word. Damn? Some said yes, some no. Personally, I think the word "sucks" is inappropriate, but others(typically the younger folks in the office)thought it was acceptable. If anything, the whole discussion has been a learning experience and thought provoker. What I find interesting is that the line in the debate are usually divided along age differences and not religious convictions.
Anonymous said…
It has been said that "Profanity is the crutch of a conversational cripple."
Cliff said…
Thanks for all the comments on a subjcet I feel strongly about

Popular posts from this blog

Post 800: Time to chat

Hi Guys, It's hard to believe that this is post number 800 for this blog. I started this blog out of my desire to communicate. Since radio and television is becoming more and more automated and less and less personal, I'm glad I made the decision to go in this direction as it has given me many blessings. When I first decided to write my musings, a friend from the radio and television boards who goes by the name of newsnomore, told me not to be discouraged if I didn't get any readers. The fact that I did in the early going made me surprised and grateful that anyone was enjoying what I wrote. I've had people tell me that maybe it wasn't meant for me to ever be in radio, that maybe my calling was blogging. Nowadays I think blogging makes for better two way conversation than terrestrial radio, especially the way I do it, non confrontational. The closest I come from any confrontation is the innocent digs that Pat and I shoot at each other. On an average day I get betwee...

From a "Battleground State"

I am going to make this one short and sweet. I live in Ohio, in this election season, one of the so called "Battleground states," a state crucial for any candidate presidential hopes. Of course we have had many visits from presidential and vice presidential candidates. Other blogs have dissected both campaigns so I will not. The only questions I have is will the promises made by either of these candidates exclusive to these states be fulfilled, or will they prove only to be hot air?

Why?

What I'm posting now is with the blessing of Chelle. Chelle is the cousin of Suzanne's husband, Richard. I had gotten the impression from both of them that they were about as close as sisters. Suzanne had been a friend of mine since I had discovered one of her blogs in July, 2006. We would make reference to each other on our blogs and would have dialogue via email quite a bit. It was no surprise to me that she was friends to many other bloggers as well. I felt it was quite an honor to be held in as high esteem as I was. We even talked to each other on the phone on occasion. I felt as we had known each other for a long time. I also knew that Suzanne was having some personal problems, much of which had to do with a very troubled marriage. I would let her bounce things off me, and I would send her some encouragement. While she was going through some of her marital problems, she made herself available to give me a lift when I needed it. My son was having some problems of his own a...